This guide extends the examples provided in Getting Started and Output Management. Please make sure you are at least familiar with the examples provided in them.
Code splitting is one of the most compelling features of webpack. This feature allows you to split your code into various bundles which can then be loaded on demand or in parallel. It can be used to achieve smaller bundles and control resource load prioritization which, if used correctly, can have a major impact on load time.
There are three general approaches to code splitting available:
entry
configuration.SplitChunksPlugin
to dedupe and split chunks.This is by far the easiest and most intuitive way to split code. However, it is more manual and has some pitfalls we will go over. Let's take a look at how we might split another module from the main bundle:
project
webpack-demo
|- package.json
|- webpack.config.js
|- /dist
|- /src
|- index.js
+ |- another-module.js
|- /node_modules
another-module.js
import _ from 'lodash';
console.log(
_.join(['Another', 'module', 'loaded!'], ' ')
);
webpack.config.js
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
mode: 'development',
entry: {
index: './src/index.js',
+ another: './src/another-module.js',
},
output: {
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
},
};
This will yield the following build result:
...
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
another.bundle.js 550 KiB another [emitted] another
index.bundle.js 550 KiB index [emitted] index
Entrypoint index = index.bundle.js
Entrypoint another = another.bundle.js
...
As mentioned there are some pitfalls to this approach:
The first of these two points is definitely an issue for our example, as lodash
is also imported within ./src/index.js
and will thus be duplicated in both bundles. Let's remove this duplication by using the SplitChunksPlugin
.
The dependOn
option allows to share the modules between the chunks
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
mode: 'development',
entry: {
- index: './src/index.js',
- another: './src/another-module.js',
+ index: { import: './src/index.js', dependOn: 'shared' },
+ another: { import: './src/another-module.js', dependOn: 'shared' },
+ shared: 'lodash',
},
output: {
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
},
};
optimization.runtimeChunk
optimization.runtimeChunk: 'single'
is needed when multiple entry points are being used on a single HTML page.
Using multiple entry points per page should be avoided when possible in favor of an entry point with multiple imports: entry: { page: ['./analytics', './app'] }
. This results in a better optimization and consistent execution order when using async
script tags.
Multiple entry points per page could be used in scenarios where HTML is generated in a dynamic matter, e. g. when components on page are unknown at compile-time and HTML page is composed dynamically depending on the data.
SplitChunksPlugin
The SplitChunksPlugin
allows us to extract common dependencies into an existing entry chunk or an entirely new chunk. Let's use this to de-duplicate the lodash
dependency from the previous example:
The
CommonsChunkPlugin
has been removed in webpack v4 legato. To learn how chunks are treated in the latest version, check out theSplitChunksPlugin
.
webpack.config.js
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
mode: 'development',
entry: {
index: './src/index.js',
another: './src/another-module.js',
},
output: {
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
},
+ optimization: {
+ splitChunks: {
+ chunks: 'all',
+ },
+ },
};
With the optimization.splitChunks
configuration option in place, we should now see the duplicate dependency removed from our index.bundle.js
and another.bundle.js
. The plugin should notice that we've separated lodash
out to a separate chunk and remove the dead weight from our main bundle. Let's do an npm run build
to see if it worked:
...
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
another.bundle.js 5.95 KiB another [emitted] another
index.bundle.js 5.89 KiB index [emitted] index
vendors~another~index.bundle.js 547 KiB vendors~another~index [emitted] vendors~another~index
Entrypoint index = vendors~another~index.bundle.js index.bundle.js
Entrypoint another = vendors~another~index.bundle.js another.bundle.js
...
Here are some other useful plugins and loaders provided by the community for splitting code:
mini-css-extract-plugin
: Useful for splitting CSS out from the main application.Two similar techniques are supported by webpack when it comes to dynamic code splitting. The first and recommended approach is to use the import()
syntax that conforms to the ECMAScript proposal for dynamic imports. The legacy, webpack-specific approach is to use require.ensure
. Let's try using the first of these two approaches...
import()
calls use promises internally. If you useimport()
with older browsers, remember to shimPromise
using a polyfill such as es6-promise or promise-polyfill.
Before we start, let's remove the extra entry
and optimization.splitChunks
from our configuration as they won't be needed for this next demonstration:
webpack.config.js
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
mode: 'development',
entry: {
index: './src/index.js',
- another: './src/another-module.js',
},
output: {
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
+ chunkFilename: '[name].bundle.js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
},
- optimization: {
- splitChunks: {
- chunks: 'all',
- },
- },
};
Note the use of chunkFilename
, which determines the name of non-entry chunk files. For more information on chunkFilename
, see output documentation. We'll also update our project to remove the now unused files:
project
webpack-demo
|- package.json
|- webpack.config.js
|- /dist
|- /src
|- index.js
- |- another-module.js
|- /node_modules
Now, instead of statically importing lodash
, we'll use dynamic importing to separate a chunk:
src/index.js
- import _ from 'lodash';
-
- function component() {
+ function getComponent() {
- const element = document.createElement('div');
-
- // Lodash, now imported by this script
- element.innerHTML = _.join(['Hello', 'webpack'], ' ');
+ return import(/* webpackChunkName: "lodash" */ 'lodash').then(({ default: _ }) => {
+ const element = document.createElement('div');
+
+ element.innerHTML = _.join(['Hello', 'webpack'], ' ');
+
+ return element;
+
+ }).catch(error => 'An error occurred while loading the component');
}
- document.body.appendChild(component());
+ getComponent().then(component => {
+ document.body.appendChild(component);
+ })
The reason we need default
is that since webpack 4, when importing a CommonJS module, the import will no longer resolve to the value of module.exports
, it will instead create an artificial namespace object for the CommonJS module. For more information on the reason behind this, read webpack 4: import() and CommonJs
Note the use of webpackChunkName
in the comment. This will cause our separate bundle to be named lodash.bundle.js
instead of just [id].bundle.js
. For more information on webpackChunkName
and the other available options, see the import()
documentation. Let's run webpack to see lodash
separated out to a separate bundle:
...
Asset Size Chunks Chunk Names
index.bundle.js 7.88 KiB index [emitted] index
vendors~lodash.bundle.js 547 KiB vendors~lodash [emitted] vendors~lodash
Entrypoint index = index.bundle.js
...
As import()
returns a promise, it can be used with async
functions. However, this requires using a pre-processor like Babel and the Syntax Dynamic Import Babel Plugin. Here's how it would simplify the code:
src/index.js
- function getComponent() {
+ async function getComponent() {
- return import(/* webpackChunkName: "lodash" */ 'lodash').then(({ default: _ }) => {
- const element = document.createElement('div');
-
- element.innerHTML = _.join(['Hello', 'webpack'], ' ');
-
- return element;
-
- }).catch(error => 'An error occurred while loading the component');
+ const element = document.createElement('div');
+ const { default: _ } = await import(/* webpackChunkName: "lodash" */ 'lodash');
+
+ element.innerHTML = _.join(['Hello', 'webpack'], ' ');
+
+ return element;
}
getComponent().then(component => {
document.body.appendChild(component);
});
It is possible to provide a dynamic expression to
import()
when you might need to import specific module based on a computed variable later.
webpack 4.6.0+ adds support for prefetching and preloading.
Using these inline directives while declaring your imports allows webpack to output “Resource Hint” which tells the browser that for:
Simple prefetch example can be having a HomePage
component, which renders a LoginButton
component which then on demand loads a LoginModal
component after being clicked.
LoginButton.js
//...
import(/* webpackPrefetch: true */ 'LoginModal');
This will result in <link rel="prefetch" href="login-modal-chunk.js">
being appended in the head of the page, which will instruct the browser to prefetch in idle time the login-modal-chunk.js
file.
webpack will add the prefetch hint once the parent chunk has been loaded.
Preload directive has a bunch of differences compared to prefetch:
Simple preload example can be having a Component
which always depends on a big library that should be in a separate chunk.
Let's imagine a component ChartComponent
which needs huge ChartingLibrary
. It displays a LoadingIndicator
when rendered and instantly does an on demand import of ChartingLibrary
:
ChartComponent.js
//...
import(/* webpackPreload: true */ 'ChartingLibrary');
When a page which uses the ChartComponent
is requested, the charting-library-chunk is also requested via <link rel="preload">
. Assuming the page-chunk is smaller and finishes faster, the page will be displayed with a LoadingIndicator
, until the already requested charting-library-chunk
finishes. This will give a little load time boost since it only needs one round-trip instead of two. Especially in high-latency environments.
Using webpackPreload incorrectly can actually hurt performance, so be careful when using it.
Once you start splitting your code, it can be useful to analyze the output to check where modules have ended up. The official analyze tool is a good place to start. There are some other community-supported options out there as well:
See Lazy Loading for a more concrete example of how import()
can be used in a real application and Caching to learn how to split code more effectively.